Why remote isn’t always the answer
Completely placing focused work in remote environments is an alluring idea. Employees are afforded a better work-life balance, more autonomy, reduced commute times, and often a more peaceful work environment. Employers see improved employee retention, productivity gain, and access to a wider talent pool, among other benefits. These benefits are not insignificant, and some remote work can definitely be positive, but not providing a physical space in the office for these activities creates several issues.
Firstly, either through lack of space, lack of equipment, or lack of privacy, many people may find it hard to be productive whilst at home. The office should act as a great leveler, providing equal access to quality work environments.
Secondly, for many people focused work is the predominant work mode and spending all day at home can be terribly lonely. A pre-pandemic study found that full-time remote work increases feelings of loneliness by 67% when compared to in-office full-time, whilst more recent studies show that this loneliness can lead to heightened levels of stress and anxiety, especially among younger workers.
Thirdly, from a more practical viewpoint, it’s not so simple to chop up your working week or day into focus and non-focus work. For example, deciding to work remotely on focus work for three days a week, then devoting two days to collaborative and social tasks based in the office sounds like a great plan, but this may not be achievable. Who knows what little periods of focus are required whilst in the office, and without suitable environments, this can cause problems.